Tagged: Peter Tupper

When you first started writing, did you have any idea you’d be writing BDSM/kinky books? Do you write in any other genre?

I wanted to write for a living since I was little, but at some point I realized how little fiction writing pays these days, and that sort of stalled. Starting about ten years ago, I’ve worked as a freelance journalist on a variety of topics. I would like to write a column or something else about kink. Fiction writing is a secondary career goal, but something I don’t want to abandon. The two sides can actually help each other.

Are you actively involved in BDSM? If so how do you identify yourself? Dom(me)/sub? Top/bottom? Switch?

I’ve been involved in the BDSM culture since about 1992, so quite a while. I’ve helped run parties and organizations. I was the co-founder of Metro Vancouver Kink, a non-profit educational/social group, and served on the board for three years. I’ve also been blogging about the history of BDSM since 2005, plus various articles and columns. Personally, I identify as a sub/masochist, perhaps more the latter.

Was there something that happened to you in your life or career that made you want to begin thinking about writing BDSM/kinky-themed erotica?

This was kind of a fluke. When I was just a newbie kinkster, I was busy reading everything I could find in the university bookstore and library. Half my brain was full of Pat Califia’s “Macho Sluts” story collection, and the other half full of early 90s critical theory on gender and sexuality. I somehow read about Circlet Press’ call for the S/M Futures anthology (now out of print), and a bunch of ideas came together. I wrote this white elephant story, over 10,000 words of rather talky stuff about fantasy and consent and brain-scanning, printed it out and mailed it in. (You had to do that back then.) To my surprise, Cecilia Tan accepted it. One of my first fiction sales. It was also part of this gigantic future history project that only had a handful of short stories published, which I’ve since abandoned.

The Archaeology of Erotica  by Peter Tupper

The history of erotica is best understood through the metaphor of archaeology. The texts, the various books and movies and still images and so forth we are familiar with, are the surface of a deep stack of layers of symbols and narratives accreted over centuries. In this process, the forms have changed repeatedly until they are distinct, but arranging them in the proper configuration, we see the evolutionary process.

Our guide on this dig is a literary and poetry critic named Harold Bloom. He explains that the relationship between different poems are either “weak misreadings”, which the poet tries in vain to get at what the earlier work was really about,  or “strong misreadings,” in which the poet appropriates what he or she needs from the earlier work to pursue his or her own ideas. Bloom was discussing poetry, but this theory applies to other genres of literature, and particularly where there is less regulation from high culture, where texts mate rather promiscuously, like erotica.

I would argue that the bulk of what is categorized as erotica today can be traced back to two highly influential books, one from the early twentieth century, the other from the middle, both by women, both with women protagonists being initiated into exotic realms of pleasure, both widely dismissed as sensational, pornographic, misogynistic trash.